Photo Credit: X-Tree-M-GamR
Firefox is my internet browser of choice; not only because I am used to it, or because it’s speedy, or because it has a good memory; but also because it has a wide range of add-ons and plug-ins to customise and personalise your internet browsing experience. From little tweaks to pre-existing features, to things like built-in translators and web development tools, These add-ons can really make a difference in your internet experience. In fact, it was Firebug that made the editing and modification of this blog’s layout much easier than I would have anticipated. I realise this is not a technology blog; so I will make my way back to the point of this post. Bottom line: Add-ons can make your basic internet browser full of fun and useful bells and whistles.
At the same time, some add-ons are just useless and annoying; and as much as you test them out with an open mind, they end up uninstalled and put on your permanent “do not re-install” list.
I am of the opinion that polyamourous, open, and selectively open relationships function in a similar way.
It is no secret that I am attracted to couples. I enjoy playing with them, interacting with them and being an extension of a pre-existing relationship. It was at my first play party (about which, I will write about later) that I got into a conversation with Eckhart and Sabine (Sabine is Eckhart’s companion. They are in a somewhat poly relationship.) about why I might have such an attraction to these couples. It came to me, that it is because I am not ready for commitment, and somehow, by letting myself be an extension of a pre-existing relationship, the need for such commitment is not as obvious or necessary as if I were to be in a relationship with a single person. In a sense, I am an add-on.
As a pet, I was an extension to Sebastian and Katja’s relationship. From my year spent with them, I learned quite a bit about issues that may come up in this kind of relationship; as well as how to resolve them. Unfortunately, there was a lot of tension between Katja and me, and as a result, I often feel overly cautious and act unintentionally awkward with the half of the couple in whom I am not primarily interested. I bring assumptions, biases and prejudices from my relationship with Sebastian and Katja into any other interaction, casual or more than casual, with a pre-established couple.
Let me try to explain a little more clearly:
I do not know about Eckhart or Sabine’s points of view on the topic; but this thing I’m doing with Eckhart is not only between him and me; but rather, mainly between him and me; and also with Sabine. Along with that comes an underlying fear that something I do will disrupt the balance between them; even though I know it is not my responsibility to maintain their relationship. Actually, that is probably the first thing I learned form being a pet. It is not my responsibility to keep the couple together, nor is it my fault if something goes wrong between that couple. Eckhart and I spoke briefly about this the other day, and it was reassuring to hear his words. The bottom line is, it isn’t the” add-on” that can destroy a relationship; but rather, how the individuals in the pre-existing relationship handle and communicate their feelings towards the add-on with each other. While I understand this concept, I am still a little bit nervous that I will cause unwanted tension in the couples with whom I play.
Another important lesson I have learned, is that I will not always have equal interest in both parties of the pre-existing couples, and it is very tiring and pointless to try and force some kind of equalisation in my interest. As I have noted in many of my past entries, I have a lot of natural chemistry with Sebastian and almost no natural chemistry with Katja. Over time, Katja and I have become friends; but it wasn’t really until close to the end of my pethood ended, that that happened. Over the course of that relationship, I mentioned a few times, that I did not have equal attraction to both Sebastian and Katja, and that it did not feel natural for me to submit to Katja, that I was almost faking it. This time, with Sabine and Eckhart, I have come in with the idea that it is okay, not to have equal attraction for both people in the couple. While I do have some attraction for Sabine, most of my interest lies in my interactions with Eckhart, and that is okay.
Sabine has already expressed feelings of slight intimidation, with respect to getting close to me. After doing some reflecting, I realised that she isn’t the only one. I find that I am overly cautious when I am interacting with my secondary interest in the couple, because there were times during my pet relationship, that I tried very hard to bond with Katja out of obligation. Now, over time, this has changed, we are friends and it is not a friendship out of obligation; but in the beginning, I had convinced myself that I needed to work hard to make the bond between Katja and me stronger. I, quite frankly, did not want my training to end, and did everything in my power to keep it going. Looking back, that was probably not the best way to go about things. After a while, the relationship was more work than fun, and that was my breaking point – when I needed things to stop. It is because of my actions during my pet training that make me ask myself multiple times a day, whether my interaction with Sabine is out of obligation; and the truth is, it isn’t. I genuinely am attracted to Sabine and enjoy her company. I am also just very insecure and nervous, because I do not want to put myself in the same situation as the one with Katja. I feel as though I could easily put myself under the illusion that my desire to spend time with Sabine is not one out of obligation, when it really is; because I was able to do that with Katja. So I am cautious, almost walking on eggshells, because I need to know, for sure, that what I am doing and want to be doing with Sabine is not out of obligation. (And for the record, I am pretty confident that nothing I am doing now is out of obligation; but these mild internal “panic and checks” happen from time to time)
It is not fair to compare any and all of my future relationships with the ones I have had in the past; but it is only my nature to do so. Sabine and Eckhart are not the first couple I have shown more than a casual interest in since ending my relationship with Sebastian and Katja; and I have noticed that in interactions post-pethood, I have treated every person of secondary interest like a time bomb. I walk on eggshells when it isn’t necessary and am apprehensive to do anything with or say anything to them, in the fear that they won’t like me and the relationship I have with their partners will go sour. Now that I have identified this behaviour in myself, I can work on actively changing it and paying attention to my actions and slowly eliminating or reducing the amount of prejudice I might bring into interactions with pre-established couples. I feel like I want this change to happen overnight; but I know that that is very unrealistic. Eckhart told me something this morning that struck a chord: I may not always feel patient, but I need to be patient.
!